1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
|
# syzbot
`syzbot` system continuously fuzzes main Linux kernel branches and automatically
reports found bugs to kernel mailing lists.
[syzbot dashboard](https://syzkaller.appspot.com) shows current statuses of
bugs. All `syzbot`-reported bugs are also CCed to
[syzkaller-bugs mailing list](https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/syzkaller-bugs).
Direct all questions to `syzkaller@googlegroups.com`.
## Bug status tracking <div id="status"/>
`syzbot` needs to know when a bug is fixed in order to (1) verify that it is
in fact fixed and (2) be able to report other similarly-looking crashes
(while a bug is considered open all similarly-looking crashes are merged into
the existing bug). To understand when a bug is fixed `syzbot` needs to know
what commit fixes the bug; once `syzbot` knows the commit it will track when
the commit reaches all kernel builds on all tracked branches. Only when the
commit reaches all builds, the bug is considered closed (new similarly-looking
crashes create a new bug).
## Communication with syzbot <div id="communication"/>
If you fix a bug reported by `syzbot`, please add the provided `Reported-by`
tag to the commit (`Reported-and-tested-by` and `Tested-by` tags with the
`syzbot+HASH` address are recognized as well). You can also communicate with
`syzbot` by replying to its emails. The commands are:
- to attach a fixing commit to the bug (if you forgot to add `Reported-by` tag):
```
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
````
It's enough that the commit is merged into any tree or you are reasonably sure
about its final title, in particular, you don't need to wait for the commit to
be merged into upstream tree. `syzbot` only needs to know the title by which
it will appear in tested trees. In case of an error or a title change, you can
override the commit simply by sending another `#syz fix` command.
- to mark the bug as a duplicate of another `syzbot` bug:
```
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
```
- to undo a previous dup command and turn it into an independent bug again:
```
#syz undup
```
- to mark the bug as a one-off invalid report (e.g. induced by a previous memory corruption):
```
#syz invalid
```
**Note**: if the crash happens again, it will cause creation of a new bug report.
**Note**: all commands must start from beginning of the line.
**Note**: please keep `syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com` mailing list in CC.
It serves as a history of what happened with each bug report.
## Testing patches
`syzbot` can test patches for bugs *with reproducers*. This can be used for
testing of fix patches, or just for debugging (i.e. adding additional checks to
code and testing with them), or to check if the bug still happens. To test on
a particular git tree and branch reply with:
```
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch
```
or alternatively, to test on exact commit reply with:
```
#syz test: git://repo/address.git commit-hash
```
If you also provide a patch with the email, `syzbot` will apply it on top of the
tree before testing. The patch can be provided either inline in email text or as
a text attachment (which is more reliable if your email client messes with
whitespaces).
If you don't provide a patch, `syzbot` will test the tree as is.
This is useful if this is your own tree which already contains the patch,
or to check if the bug is already fixed by some recent commit.
After sending an email you should get a reply email with results within an hour.
Note: you may send the request only to `syzbot` email address, as patches sent
to some mailing lists (e.g. netdev, netfilter-devel) will trigger patchwork.
Note: see [below](#kmsan-bugs) for testing `KMSAN` bugs.
## Bisection <div id="bisection"/>
`syzbot` bisects bugs with reproducers to find commit that introduced the bug.
`syzbot` starts with the commit on which the bug was discovered, ensures that it
can reproduce the bug and then goes back release-by-release to find the first
release where kernel does not crash. Once such release is found, `syzbot` starts
bisection on that range. `syzbot` has limitation of how far back in time it can
go (currently `v4.1`), going back in time is [very hard](/pkg/vcs/linux.go)
because of incompatible compiler/linker/asm/perl/make/libc/etc, kernel
build/boot breakages and large amounts of bugs.
The predicate for bisection is binary (crash/doesn't crash), `syzbot` does not
look at the exact crash and does not try to differentiate them. This is
intentional because lots of bugs can manifest in different ways (sometimes 50+
different ways). For each revision `syzbot` repeats testing 10 times and
a single crash marks revision as bad (lots of bugs are due to races and are
hard to trigger).
During bisection `syzbot` uses different compilers depending on kernel revision
(a single compiler can't build all revisions). These compilers are available
[here](https://storage.googleapis.com/syzkaller/bisect_bin.tar.gz).
Exact compiler used to test a particular revision is specified in the bisection
log.
Bisection is best-effort and may not find the right commit for multiple reasons,
including:
- hard to reproduce bugs that trigger with very low probability
- bug being introduced before the tool that reliably detects it (LOCKDEP, KASAN,
FAULT_INJECTION, WARNING, etc);\
such bugs may be bisection to the addition/improvement of the tool
- kernel build/boot errors that force skipping revisions
- some kernel configs are [disabled](/pkg/vcs/linux.go) as bisection goes back
in time because they build/boot break release tags;\
bugs in these subsystems may be bisected to release tags
- reproducers triggering multiple kernel bugs at once
- unrelated kernel bugs that break even simple programs
A single incorrect decision during bisection leads to an incorrect result,
so please treat the results with understanding. You may consult the provided
`bisection log` to see how/why `syzbot` has arrived to a particular commit.
Suggestions and patches that improve bisection quality for common cases are
[welcome](https://github.com/google/syzkaller/issues/1051).
## syzkaller reproducers
`syzbot` aims at providing stand-alone C reproducers for all reported bugs.
However, sometimes it can't extract a reproducer at all, or can only extract a
syzkaller reproducer. syzkaller reproducers are programs in a special syzkaller
notation and they can be executed on the target system with a little bit more
effort. See [this](https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/master/docs/executing_syzkaller_programs.md)
for instructions.
A syskaller program can also give you an idea as to what syscalls with what
arguments were executed (note that some calls can actually be executed in
parallel).
A syzkaller program can be converted to an almost equivalent C source using `syz-prog2c` utility. `syz-prog2c` has lots of flags in common with [syz-execprog](https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/master/docs/executing_syzkaller_programs.md), e.g. `-threaded`/`-collide` which control if the syscalls are executed sequentially or in parallel. An example invocation:
```
syz-prog2c -prog repro.syz.txt -enable=all -threaded -collide -repeat -procs=8 -sandbox=namespace -segv -tmpdir -waitrepeat
```
However, note that if `syzbot` did not provide a C reproducer, it wasn't able to trigger the bug using the C program (though, it can be just because the bug is triggered by a subtle race condition).
## Crash does not reproduce?
If the provided reproducer does not work for you, most likely it is related to the
fact that you have slightly different setup than `syzbot`. `syzbot` has obtained
the provided crash report on the provided reproducer on a freshly-booted
machine, so the reproducer worked for it somehow.
Note: if the report contains `userspace arch: i386`,
then the program needs to be built with `-m32` flag.
`syzbot` uses GCE VMs for testing, but *usually* it is not important.
If the reproducer exits quickly, try to run it several times, or in a loop.
There can be some races involved.
Exact compilers used by `syzbot` can be found here:
- [gcc 7.1.1 20170620](https://storage.googleapis.com/syzkaller/gcc-7.tar.gz) (245MB)
- [gcc 8.0.1 20180301](https://storage.googleapis.com/syzkaller/gcc-8.0.1-20180301.tar.gz) (286MB)
- [gcc 8.0.1 20180412](https://storage.googleapis.com/syzkaller/gcc-8.0.1-20180412.tar.gz) (33MB)
- [gcc 9.0.0 20181231](https://storage.googleapis.com/syzkaller/gcc-9.0.0-20181231.tar.gz) (30MB)
- [clang 7.0.0 (trunk 329060)](https://storage.googleapis.com/syzkaller/clang-kmsan-329060.tar.gz) (44MB)
- [clang 7.0.0 (trunk 334104)](https://storage.googleapis.com/syzkaller/clang-kmsan-334104.tar.gz) (44MB)
- [clang 8.0.0 (trunk 343298)](https://storage.googleapis.com/syzkaller/clang-kmsan-343298.tar.gz) (45MB)
A qemu-suitable Debian/wheezy image can be found [here](https://storage.googleapis.com/syzkaller/wheezy.img) (1GB, compression somehow breaks it), root ssh key for it is [here](https://storage.googleapis.com/syzkaller/wheezy.img.key)
(do `chmod 0600` on it). A reference `qemu` command line to run it is as follows:
```
qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 2 -m 4G -enable-kvm -cpu host \
-net nic -net user,hostfwd=tcp::10022-:22 \
-kernel arch/x86/boot/bzImage -nographic \
-device virtio-scsi-pci,id=scsi \
-device scsi-hd,bus=scsi.0,drive=d0 \
-drive file=wheezy.img,format=raw,if=none,id=d0 \
-append "root=/dev/sda console=ttyS0 earlyprintk=serial rodata=n \
oops=panic panic_on_warn=1 panic=86400 kvm-intel.nested=1 \
security=apparmor ima_policy=tcb workqueue.watchdog_thresh=140 \
nf-conntrack-ftp.ports=20000 nf-conntrack-tftp.ports=20000 \
nf-conntrack-sip.ports=20000 nf-conntrack-irc.ports=20000 \
nf-conntrack-sane.ports=20000 vivid.n_devs=16 \
vivid.multiplanar=1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2 \
spec_store_bypass_disable=prctl nopcid"
```
And then you can ssh into it using:
```
ssh -p 10022 -i wheezy.id_rsa root@localhost
```
## No reproducer at all?
Reproducers are best-effort. `syzbot` always tries to create reproducers, and
once it has one it adds it to the bug. If there is no reproducer referenced in a
bug, a reproducer does not exist. There are multiple reasons why `syzbot` can
fail to create a reproducer: some crashes are caused by subtle races and are
very hard to reproduce in general; some crashes are caused by global accumulated
state in kernel (e.g. lockdep reports); some crashes are caused by
non-reproducible coincidences (e.g. an integer `0x12345` happened to reference an
existing IPC object) and there is long tail of other reasons.
## Moderation queue
Bugs with reproducers are automatically reported to kernel mailing lists.
Bugs without reproducers are first staged in moderation queue to filter out
invalid, unactionable or duplicate reports. Staged bugs are shown on dashboard
in [moderation](https://syzkaller.appspot.com/#upstream-moderation2) section
and mailed to
[syzkaller-upstream-moderation](https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/syzkaller-upstream-moderation)
mailing list. Staged bugs accept all commands supported for reported bugs
(`fix`, `dup`, `invalid`) with a restriction that bugs reported upstream
can't be `dup`-ed onto bugs in moderation queue. Additionally, staged bugs
accept upstream command:
```
#syz upstream
```
which sends the bug to kernel mailing lists.
## KMSAN bugs
`KMSAN` is a dynamic, compiler-based tool (similar to `KASAN`) that detects
uses of uninitialized values. As compared to (now deleted) `KMEMCHECK` which
simply detected loads of non-stored-to memory, `KMSAN` tracks precise
propagation of uninitialized values through memory and registers and only flags
actual eventual uses of uninitialized values. For example, `KMSAN` will detect
a branch on or a `copy_to_user()` of values that transitively come from
uninitialized memory created by heap/stack allocations. This ensures
/theoretical/ absense of both false positives and false negatives (with some
implementation limitations of course). Note that `KMSAN` requires `clang` compiler.
`KMSAN` is not upstream yet, though, we want to upstream it later. For now,
it lives in [github.com/google/kmsan](https://github.com/google/kmsan) and is
based on a reasonably fresh upstream tree. As the result, any patch testing
requests for `KMSAN` bugs need to go to `KMSAN` tree
(`https://github.com/google/kmsan.git` repo, `master` branch).
A standard way for triggering the test with `KMSAN` tree is to send an
email to `syzbot+HASH` address containing the following line:
```
#syz test: https://github.com/google/kmsan.git master
```
and attach/inline your test patch in the same email.
Report explanation. The first call trace points to the `use` of the uninit value
(which is usually a branching or copying it to userspace). Then there are 0 or
more "Uninit was stored to memory at:" stacks which denote how the unint value
travelled through memory. Finally there is a "Uninit was created at:"
section which points either to a heap allocation or a stack variable which
is the original source of uninitialized-ness.
## No custom patches
While `syzbot` can test patches that fix bugs, it does not support applying
custom patches during fuzzing. It always tests vanilla unmodified git trees.
There are several reasons for this:
- custom patches may not apply tomorrow
- custom patches may not apply to all of the tested git trees
- it's hard to communicate exact state of the code with bug reports (not just hash anymore)
- line numbers won't match in reports (which always brings suspecion as to the quality of reports)
- custom patches can also introduce bugs, and even if they don't a developer may (rightfully)
question validity of and may not want to spend time on reports obtained
with a number of out-of-tree patches
- order of patch application generatelly matters, and at some point patches
need to be removed, there is nobody to manage this
We've experimented with application of custom patches in the past and it lead
to unrecoverable mess. If you want `syzbot` to pick up patches sooner,
ask tree maintainers for priority handling.
However, syzbot kernel config always includes `CONFIG_DEBUG_AID_FOR_SYZBOT=y` setting,
which is not normally present in kernel. What was used for particularly elusive bugs in the past
is temporary merging some additional debugging code into `linux-next` under this config setting
(e.g. more debug checks and/or debug output) and waiting for new crash reports from syzbot.
## Kernel configs
Kernel configs, sysctls and command line arguments that `syzbot` uses are available in [/dashboard/config](/dashboard/config).
## Is syzbot code available?
Yes, it is [here](https://github.com/google/syzkaller/tree/master/dashboard/app).
|