From 2bdcee05b50579be92a767376eaf874c0c70233c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dmitry Vyukov Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 17:18:38 +0100 Subject: sys/linux: mark all nested netlink attributes as nlnest As far as I understand most subsystems don't care about the nest flag, but some do. But marking them as nest won't harm (?). Let's mark all of them. Caught several cases where should have been used array[policy] but used just policy. Update #590 --- sys/linux/socket_netlink_generic_netlabel.txt | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'sys/linux/socket_netlink_generic_netlabel.txt') diff --git a/sys/linux/socket_netlink_generic_netlabel.txt b/sys/linux/socket_netlink_generic_netlabel.txt index b06fbc3f0..1891a8c40 100644 --- a/sys/linux/socket_netlink_generic_netlabel.txt +++ b/sys/linux/socket_netlink_generic_netlabel.txt @@ -84,9 +84,9 @@ sendmsg$NLBL_CIPSOV4_C_LISTALL(fd sock_nl_generic, msg ptr[in, msghdr_netlbl_cip netlbl_cipsov4_genl_policy [ NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_DOI nlattr[NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_DOI, flags[cipso_doi, int32]] NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_MTYPE nlattr[NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_MTYPE, flags[cipsov4_type, int32]] - NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_TAGLST nlattr[NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_TAGLST, array[nlattr[NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_TAG, flags[cipsov4_tags, int8]]]] - NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_MLSLVLLST nlattr[NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_MLSLVLLST, array[nlattr[NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_MLSLVL, array[netlbl_cipsov4_genl_policy_mlslvl]]]] - NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_MLSCATLST nlattr[NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_MLSCATLST, array[nlattr[NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_MLSCAT, array[netlbl_cipsov4_genl_policy_mlscat]]]] + NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_TAGLST nlnest[NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_TAGLST, array[nlattr[NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_TAG, flags[cipsov4_tags, int8]]]] + NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_MLSLVLLST nlnest[NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_MLSLVLLST, array[nlnest[NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_MLSLVL, array[netlbl_cipsov4_genl_policy_mlslvl]]]] + NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_MLSCATLST nlnest[NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_MLSCATLST, array[nlnest[NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_MLSCAT, array[netlbl_cipsov4_genl_policy_mlscat]]]] ] [varlen] netlbl_cipsov4_genl_policy_mlslvl [ -- cgit mrf-deployment