From 4b042b7d6708cae4cb29fa41b89deea14b2eea32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dmitry Vyukov Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 08:46:10 +0100 Subject: sys/linux: fix int64 alignment on 386 Turns out int64 alignment is 4 on 386... But on arm it's still 8. Another amusing finding thanks to syz-check. Update #590 --- sys/linux/socket.txt.warn | 7 ++----- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'sys/linux/socket.txt.warn') diff --git a/sys/linux/socket.txt.warn b/sys/linux/socket.txt.warn index 024058090..823772a74 100644 --- a/sys/linux/socket.txt.warn +++ b/sys/linux/socket.txt.warn @@ -23,17 +23,14 @@ no-such-struct: devname_mask no-such-struct: ifs_ifsu bad-field-size: ifconf.req/ifc_len: syz=16 kernel=4 [amd64] bad-field-size: ifconf.req/ifc_len: syz=8 kernel=4 [386] -bad-field-size: ifconf.buf/ifc_ifcu: syz=16 kernel=8 [amd64] -bad-field-offset: ifconf.buf/ifc_ifcu: syz=8 kernel=4 [386] +bad-field-offset: ifconf.buf/ifc_ifcu: syz=16 kernel=8 [amd64] +bad-field-size: ifconf.buf/ifc_ifcu: syz=8 kernel=4 [386] no-such-struct: ifconf_buf no-such-struct: ifconf_req no-such-struct: brctl_arg no-such-struct: brctl_arg_get no-such-struct: brctl_arg_add_del no-such-struct: brctl_arg_generic -bad-struct-size: ethtool_rx_flow_spec: syz=168 kernel=160 [386] -bad-field-offset: ethtool_rx_flow_spec.ring_cookie: syz=152 kernel=148 [386] -bad-field-offset: ethtool_rx_flow_spec.location: syz=160 kernel=156 [386] no-such-struct: ethtool_flow_union no-such-struct: ethtool_rx_ntuple no-such-struct: ethtool_rx_ntuple_flow_spec -- cgit mrf-deployment