| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
| |
Update #590
|
| |
|
|
| |
They are not really structs in the kernel even if we describe them as structs.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Regenerate warn files on the latest kernel commit fe8152b38d3
and latest syzkaller commit with fresh kernel config files.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
On latest kernel, with latest *.txt files and with kernels compiled with
-fno-eliminate-unused-debug-types -fno-eliminate-unused-debug-symbols flags.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Update #590
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Handle NLA_BITFIELD32.
Match string attribtues better.
Calculate and check min size for varlen structs.
Fix NLA_UNSPEC size check.
Fix some things in descriptions.
Update #590
|
| |
|
|
| |
Update #590
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As far as I understand most subsystems don't care about
the nest flag, but some do. But marking them as nest
won't harm (?). Let's mark all of them.
Caught several cases where should have been used array[policy]
but used just policy.
Update #590
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1. Match policies that has a _suffix in our descriptions
(we frequently do this to improve precision or avoid dup names).
2. Rename policies in descriptions to match kernel names.
3. Match policy if there are several such names in kernel.
4. Recognize policies with helper sub-policies.
Update #590
|
| |
|
|
| |
Update #590
|
| |
|
|
| |
+ some netlink descriptions
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Turns out int64 alignment is 4 on 386...
But on arm it's still 8.
Another amusing finding thanks to syz-check.
Update #590
|
| |
|
|
| |
Update #590
|
| |
|
|
| |
Update #590
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Also rename some netfilter types to eliminate massive amounts of template warnings.
Update #590
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Line numbers create huge diffs when lines change slightly.
That's very unhandy b/c we want to look at added/removed warnings.
|
|
|
syz-check parses vmlinux dwarf, extracts struct descriptions,
compares them with what we have (size, fields, alignment, etc)
and produces .warn files.
This is first raw version, it can be improved in a number of ways.
But it already helped to identify a critical issue #1542
and shows some wrong struct descriptions.
Update #590
|
